Getting the balance right
What are the key issues we should bear in mind when working out the balance of measures that keep people safe, yet allow as much freedom as possible?
Why the contribution is important
The Scottish Government has committed to engaging with the public and is interested to hear your thoughts on this topic.
by ScottishGovernment on October 05, 2020 at 08:52AM
Posted by EllMcc October 05, 2020 at 16:20
We're given no notice and the vast majority are sticking to the rules.
We cannot totally suppress the virus, but the ScotGov is hell bent on doing that.
We need to learn to live with it. So many of us are at breaking point and the gov doesn't seem to care about anything but numbers?
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Cheryl October 05, 2020 at 16:36
People cannot be expected to go to work but not see their family, children going to school but not seeing their grandparents. School staff being in work but not seeing their families, some school staff are grandparents who spend a full day with 30 children but cannot see their own grandchildren later that night or at the weekend.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kevinm152 October 05, 2020 at 16:58
Prioritising one over the other cannot happen, as it will lead to other social or economic impacts.
The virus will not go away.
The vast majority have learned to live with it, wear masks, take precautions.
The biggest area of concern is hospitality as alcohol fuels stupidity. Pre booking with limited numbers should be the way ahead for the hospitality industry. No pre booking means no entry and you’ll cut out out ad hoc drinking sessions.
Open up the venues, stadiums, open air places, let the economy move on. Restricted numbers and robust systems in place
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Angelaahill October 05, 2020 at 17:10
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mandally10 October 05, 2020 at 17:24
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Donnamck October 05, 2020 at 17:34
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Homeburd October 05, 2020 at 17:46
The housing market is booming since lockdown and you should be mindful that a lot of those moving are doing so to be better able to cope with current restrictions (home working) and future lockdowns (perhaps moving closer to family to be within travel restrictions)
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Trp October 05, 2020 at 17:53
Prioritise family life and the vulnerable. None of us want our elderly relatives to catch covid but I think the judgement over whether to visit family could be left with individuals. We are unable to visit family members who have significant health problems and are isolated yet we are able to stay in a hotel where many other people are, you are trusting others to clean efficiently, people are drinking and so not taking so much care etc. A blanket ban on visiting people is really detrimental to some people.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Jbined October 05, 2020 at 17:53
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Clogs1217 October 05, 2020 at 17:56
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Willyjot October 05, 2020 at 17:58
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mic October 05, 2020 at 18:13
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Leekyb83 October 05, 2020 at 18:17
The majority of us are being sensible, and sticking to the rules. Seems we are being punished for everyone else. Hit massive fines on everyone attending house parties. Let the rest of us get on with our lives sensibly and carefully.
Same with the local lockdowns, don’t punish the whole country because the central belt infections are high. As someone said above, can’t we have a level per 100,000. The same as the quarantine cut off. A clearly visible line with clear consequences if the number is too high.
I have never had any mental health issues and am an emotionally strong person, and this is getting to me. I worry for those with mental health concerns. Isolation is not good.
People with other serious health concerns not getting their diagnoses and treatment due to covid getting priority. It’s just not fair.
We definitely need a balance and it needs to be fair to the ones who are putting the effort in to be careful and considerate of others
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Ursula October 05, 2020 at 18:24
People should be allowed to visit with their families indoors. Have the same restrictions on numbers as before and the increased numbers outside where social distancing can be observed more easily. People should be allowed to see their dying and ill relatives in hospitals and care settings.
Businesses should be allowed to open up with the enhanced hygiene/track and trace etc and should be inspected fortnightly. If they fail and inspection or have a confirmed case within their establishment they must close for two weeks for isolation of staff and thorough deep cleaning by a professional team.
Children need to be kept in school as much as possible and groups/venues for those under 5s need to be restarted as well so that they and their parents don’t miss out on essential support and opportunities.
Shielding for the extremely vulnerable should be brought back in with additional payments being available to those who are shielding/their household if that means they can’t work.
We need to take seriously the mental health of the nation as that is having a much worse affect than the actual virus. We need to stop with all the doom and gloom and get on with learning to live with the virus as it will never be driven to zero.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Laura87 October 05, 2020 at 18:34
Bigger fines for not wearing masks or breaking restrictions, especially not isolating. I'm not saying that there are no genuinely exempt people, but there's no way that half the people on buses and trains with their masks around their necks or not wearing at all, are exempt. My 87 year old granny with end stage COPD wears a face covering!! Make exemption require a doctor note.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by GSS October 05, 2020 at 18:34
Not just for the grandparents but several people have told me that their young grandchildren are now afraid to hug family members after earlier lockdown.
And people should not have to choose between family members - do I see my son's family or my daughters. Can't see both!
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Missplus October 05, 2020 at 18:36
Please don’t remove the bubble option if stricter measures come in as it has allowed me to give my elderly father some regular human contact. He found being alone extremely difficult to deal with.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by StewartGilmour October 05, 2020 at 18:46
Learn to do so.
This is a disgrace what is going on, no real leadership
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by TSmith64 October 05, 2020 at 18:50
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Redfox October 05, 2020 at 18:52
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kayrob October 05, 2020 at 19:09
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by StephIhoe October 05, 2020 at 19:32
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Sarahg90 October 05, 2020 at 19:34
Weddings are few and far between at the moment making them even more important for hospitality.
Funerals also shouldn't be touched. People are going through enough.
Empower people with information and knowledge to make calculated risks of they want to.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Oorvvillie October 05, 2020 at 19:37
The government focus should be on repairing our crumbling institutions and services so the nation can weather any storm.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by LAS October 05, 2020 at 19:51
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by getusoutofhere October 05, 2020 at 19:53
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by PaulA October 05, 2020 at 19:55
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Avocado October 05, 2020 at 19:57
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Scottishkiwi October 05, 2020 at 20:10
We will never be like NZ, so we need to stop trying to be. We cannot eradicate the virus, so we need to find a way to live with it.
I don’t know any older, or “vulnerable“, person who wants to live in this current state either.
Most people are happy to adhere to sensible restrictions do guidance, however, there is only so long they will continue to do so if there is no evidence it is beneficial.... or that the Govt is also doing it’s part. Testing needs to be more accessible and timely. Having to sit for hours refreshing the Gov website until a test slot opens up, then travel to Edinburgh airport isn’t exactly accessible.
Thanks for opening up this to the public.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by jakkyb7 October 05, 2020 at 20:10
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by kaz618 October 05, 2020 at 20:13
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mrsb77 October 05, 2020 at 20:22
Spell out the mitigations for families... It has been done for everything from hospitality through to construction..
Give families a checklist so they know exactly what to do to keep their homes covid free
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Sam424 October 05, 2020 at 20:37
However, the rhetoric now seems to be about saving every single person from COVID (which if possible I think the whole country would do what ever they could) but it cannot come at the price of deaths elsewhere, it cannot come at the cost of people's whole lives being destroyed by loss of income, and then the knock on effects of debt, homelessness, poverty, poor mental health, education of our children and the effect on their futures. There has to be balance in what is being done. People HAVE to work (unless you plan to change the way our whole society works); people have to have access to health care that would usually be routine but is now not available (even when the numbers of patients in hospital was tiny!)
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Charlotta October 05, 2020 at 20:42
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by alileslie October 05, 2020 at 20:44
A better work/life balance for adults is also necessary. We need to be with friends and family. Metal health is vitally important and should drive decisions.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ammys83 October 05, 2020 at 20:54
This entire year has nearly passed and my mother cannot visit her elderly father in England, my only grandparent left and I cannot see him and he cannot meet my children. How is this right? Millions of families have been kept apart & in the meantime we are missing precious moments with our loved ones and sadly some may even pass during this time without being given the opportunity of a final meeting. We cannot live our lives in fear, that is no life at all.
A vaccine for something that is not fully understood is dangerous and potentially lethal. Vaccines take years of trials and testing before being classed as safe. We have to return to normality before life as we knew it crumbles. It’s not about putting wealth before health, it’s about putting sanity, togetherness and family at the forefront. We cannot be dictated to, that is not a free Scotland. Yes it may be a risk but one worth taking.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Ftay20 October 05, 2020 at 20:54
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Myboybob1998 October 05, 2020 at 20:57
Please give them more consideration when considering further lockdowns human contact is essential and families are surely not going to deliberately put their relatives at undue risk.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Lornab13 October 05, 2020 at 21:16
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kerrie79 October 05, 2020 at 21:27
Also lift the restrictions for children, my daughter is at school all day with her friends but isn’t allowed to play with them inside afterwards. Her birthday is start of November and she wants a sleepover with her friends who are in her bubble at school.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mitzy1987 October 05, 2020 at 21:48
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by katacan October 05, 2020 at 22:08
Every briefing, interview and article that mentions possible ‘circuit breakers’, further restrictions, etc, undermine an already battered economy, making trading harder and business planning almost impossible.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Seven19 October 05, 2020 at 22:24
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by montyred October 05, 2020 at 22:27
Across society people are suffering in different ways, emotionally and economically. It can’t go on like this. We have to accept that we can’t destroy the virus, and many people do not have time on their side for one reason or another, so we can’t go on threatening more restrictions. There are too many as it is.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Carolscat October 05, 2020 at 22:36
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ScottishLass October 05, 2020 at 22:50
If fit and healthy people are happy to go to work and go out and spend money in economy - why should they not be allowed? We cant stay locked up and going round in circles. Many places have not yet even had the chance to open - we cant lockdown again.
Weaker, old, frail or even scared people have every right to stay in and be cautious. However life needs to go on
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ScottishLass October 05, 2020 at 23:10
You are not counting this statistics, nor are you removing cars for peoples safety.
There is risk involved in everything we do and although its sad and unfortunate - people die every day from one thing or another.
Please start counting suicide rates and deaths from cancer.
Also, please count flu cases and people hospitalised with flu this year ... with that in mind we have a so-called flu vaccine
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Jason2488 October 05, 2020 at 23:25
Also more information about how best to protect ourselves (Windows Open etc?)
No matter how often the first minister pleading with certain people they will ignore her.
So set a fair and open set of rules. 10 key points or so.
If you breach them you feel the full force of the law and imprisonment. Someone walking around murdering people would rightly deserve jail time.
Why can you walk round and spread a virus which is a known killer and not face the full force of the law ?
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Chegs October 06, 2020 at 00:25
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by EastNeukgirl October 06, 2020 at 01:44
It seems to have become a crime to catch an infectious disease. This approach must surely deter people from seeking help if they are unwell.
Please allow us to visit our relatives indoors...it’s nearly winter. My profoundly disabled daughter cannot sit outside in her wheelchair in order to see her grandparents. Ironically, we could meet them at a pub ,in which setting my daughter would be much more exposed to health risks(she puts everything in her mouth.)She has autism and needs her familiar routine.
Please discuss and consider the harms being caused by lockdown type restrictions . Everyone is scared .People are reluctant to seek medical advice in general. People are losing their livelihoods at a frightening rate.My disabled daughter’s world has shrunk. None of her activities has restarted. Most elderly people that I know are keeping themselves extra safe while doing the things that they wish to do.
Fear damages people and everyone that I know is anxious and fearful .We are going into the darkness of winter. We need to be able to see our relatives and friends, indoors. There is already huge mental health collateral damage and this will increase drastically if we are not allowed human contact.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Seriouslystrong October 06, 2020 at 03:41
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by alanmacrae41 October 06, 2020 at 05:58
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by LeiaAvra October 06, 2020 at 07:52
Consider this
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Silversparkles84 October 06, 2020 at 08:46
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by IrvingBulloch October 06, 2020 at 08:53
I have a concern regarding non compliance by the Criminal element of our country , do drug pushers stay at home and not go out pushing their illegal trade.
I think we should have a greater degree of reporting detail on who is infected ,by location, ,ethenticity , furlough, working, education, retired.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Libdah October 06, 2020 at 08:56
A balance has to be struck whereby the vulnerable can continue to be protected but the rest of society need to get on with life, accepting that the virus will always be with us. Just as colds and flu are ever present.
Our economy and way of life is being destroyed by Governments who are taking heavy handed measures.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ldms October 06, 2020 at 09:07
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by FRWood October 06, 2020 at 09:34
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JoMacD October 06, 2020 at 09:51
Yet there is a minority who are not being as mindful, and who I believe will not comply with any further restrictions. Which raises the question why restrict things further and penalise a majority who are already being sensible.
Cases in our area are very low, I don’t think a blanket approach is helpful now.
Continue to expand testing capacity and contact tracing capacity nationally while focusing on trying to reduce transmission in areas with higher infection ratings.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Linzpinz October 06, 2020 at 09:58
I agree with most of the excellent comments above.
There seems to be little consideration of what happens if a vaccination doesn't materialise next March. We cannot sustain this for longer and expect our hospitality, aviation, and arts industries to still exist.
Livelihoods are being lost. This is tragic and worse than the effects of the virus.
We cannot continue to yo-yo between lockdowns and lockdown release. We just need to get on with our lives, obey the maskwearing, distancing and hand washing rules. Enforce harsher penalties for non adherencee of face masks in public places.
We should be treated like adults, educated as to the risks so that we can protect ourselves and those around us.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by rmk October 06, 2020 at 10:18
The latter might be good for the economy, but family life is more important. Any visitors we have (even family) we've been following much stricter cleaning regimes, and ensuring an appropriate distance is maintained wherever possible.
It is nonsensical that pubs and restaurants, especially those with forced air recirculation, have been shown in numerous case studies globally from China, to the USA, Norway, and Spain to name a few are often locations where so-called 'super-spreaders' cause mass infection and yet they remain encouraged over social visits.
I am NOT suggesting we allow house parties of 15 people, but there's a big difference between that and meeting your parents for a cup of tea in their own home, not surrounded by many others, the legislation has ceased to be proportionate.
If the government have overwhelming evidence that small gatherings of 4-5 people indoors are the primary cause of spread just now, share that with the public, and share it with the world so it can be reviewed and discussion can be had why we're seeing different patterns than everywhere else with peer-reviewed studies.
Likewise, questions should be asked about full-time return to schools and universities. We're still encouraged to work from home wherever possible, so learning from home should be encouraged as well, perhaps make schools part time so only half the student population is present at any one time (e.g. year groups 1,3,5 for half the week and 2,4,6 for the other, which will also reduce co-mingling between year groups)
We have to view this with an approach of risk assessment and mitigation, not a view to eliminate risk which is not possible in any situation. The number of total deaths (not just COVID) in the last few months has actually reduced from the year on year because people aren't going out at all, but we can't remain wrapped in cotton wool for ever.
By all means maintain restrictions on large gatherings, mass events etc, but unless NHS Scotland is overwhelmed, which it isn't, allow people some sense of normality, allow them to focus on their mental health and their family, without worrying about breaking the law by having a cup of tea with an older parent.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Blewis48 October 06, 2020 at 11:07
We need to learn to live with this virus and shutting things down, restricting people meeting families in their own homes is not the answer.
A simple look on social media and news you see doctor devastated that patients are coming to them to late for people with cancer like symptom, heart disease, etc. Mental health is plummeting and all we hear about is COVID. Feel we need to accept that people will catch it and protect those we can but by locking things down I fear our “cure” will cause a more dramatic rise in deaths through cancer, suicides and other health conditions.
We can’t copy countries like NZ who managed to pretty much eliminate it through strict restrictions but that include strict travel restrictions into NZ which their geography allows, we can’t do that.
I’m glad I don’t need to make these decisions but hope they can have a wider and longer term view of what’s happening rather than focusing on the here and now.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Puffin1730 October 06, 2020 at 11:17
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JaneMurray October 06, 2020 at 11:51
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Cookie2 October 06, 2020 at 12:25
Now, more than six months in, it is clear that we need to plan for a much longer term which has to mean a different approach entirely. Decide what our values are and focus on these.
I personally think we need a totally new look at the approach we take - more and more lockdowns with so much uncertainty for everyone is just not good enough. So many people are being broken emotionally at the moment and that cannot be allowed to go on.
I believe that we need to feel that we are empowered to do what is important to us and be supported to mitigate the risks for ourselves. Government dictates, that don't make sense to us, are not helping anyone and only encouraging people to ignore them. The different limitations for hospitality v family at home being the biggest contradiction in my book - especially when alcohol is involved. I agree that there is an issue with house parties or big groups in small homes but I have a large house with plenty space and 3 toilets so why can I not even allow my sister to come in for a cup of tea? Is there really scientific evidence that it is this level of contact that is spreading the disease? I find that very hard to believe. Perhaps a simple flow chart to help households make decisions about what is a reasonable risk and what is not could be published and shared with all to encourage sensible decision making.
My 93 year old mother, with dementia, is in a lovely care home which allows as much visiting as the government guidance allows, but it is not enough. I am watching her wither in front of my eyes through lack of stimulation and family contact. The lack of real family contact is criminal and has taken all her quality of life away. I used to spend a lot of time with my mum, doing things like knitting, playing the piano and looking at photographs with her on most days. That was when she was at her happiest. Now I can't even look at a photo album with her as she is too far away to see.
She is miserable most of the time despite the best efforts of lovely carers. We chose mums care home because of the clear message that we would be partners in mums care and were welcome at any time. This is no longer permitted regardless of the actual risk we present. Residents in care homes are individuals with their own needs. Risk / Benefit analysis should be undertaken for each resident to ensure that the best possible arrangement can be made for safe contact with family members or close friends taking account of the emotional impact of isolation. The lifestyle of the relatives would be one of the factors that could be considered. Many care home relatives are older and take a lot of care about who they make contact with but no one seems to take any account of that. I am no more risk to my mum than some of her carers. I am actually luckier than others that I can visit my mum indoors albeit for only 30 minutes a week. Some relatives do not get any indoor visits at all. This is wholly unacceptable and government must urgently ensure that this care home lottery is stopped and the needs of both residents and relatives are taken into consideration, through legislation if necessary.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Pippa202 October 06, 2020 at 12:37
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Bigshire October 06, 2020 at 15:35
If I am in an area that has a high rate of infection requiring no visiting in homes, then ALL social gatherings should be limited or prohibited. If I live in an area with strict restrictions, traveling outside my affected area is counter to keeping the virus contained by its very nature...
We missed the epidemiological ball on this one. A full year of strict isolation and it would have been over. The economy would have taken a huge hit, but Government programs would have kept everyone eating and a roof overhead. We are too far into this to use this scenario at all without completely collapsing the entire UK. Getting the balance right now means making restrictions that make sense, don't contradict the goal, and allow the economy to recover or, at the very least, stay in business until we can beat this virus. Mostly it means giving clear, easily understood instructions from the government that actually make sense for local outbreaks not to spread further and relying on the public to be SUPER responsible (with consequences of decent severity to deter aberrant behavior) until sufficient medical advances have been made.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by EMA191 October 06, 2020 at 16:38
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by CC2187 October 06, 2020 at 16:39
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kainsoch October 06, 2020 at 18:32
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by DRWilson October 06, 2020 at 19:45
The current rules about not being able to take any one in a car is farcical. Due to circumstances we have a family member who sometimes resides elsewhere and the current rules means I am unable to pick him up in the family car. I could get myself a taxi badge and pick him up but not in my own car. Farcical and hugely difficult for our family.
These are 2 examples where their restrictions are in humane. This can be applied to care home visiting and hospital visiting. One family member was unable to have any visitors which was hugely distressing to him. This was on the basis he was not in end of life care. He spent 4 full days without a visitor having been used to daily family visits. The family were called in to visit on the fifth day, the day he sadly died.
I strongly maintain that, while clearly the implications of Covid have to be considered, public policy needs to better take account and respond to the huge social, economic and education implications arising. The balance is completely skewed at this time. Both UK and Scottish Government’s need to better balance their decision making otherwise the social and economic issues will be devastating.
I am now unclear what the aims and objectives are, such as , protecting the NHS which no longer appears to be an issue.
Clearer objectives supported by clear and concise reasoning is required as the data or science based evidence seems to shift to suit whatever narrative applies at any one time with the current focus on cases as opposed to hospitalisation or deaths.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Catpurr October 06, 2020 at 21:05
Constant restrictions and possible lockdowns are not a way to live long term. We need to learn to live with this virus. The lockdown in the spring was the right thing to do, but the time should have been used to come up with a long term plan - as it was very obvious that the virus wasn't going anywhere.
The balance should be up to that individual person as we are all different - something which is important to me - might not be important to someone else. Give us the facts and let us decide how we live in the current world. Keep face masks and social distancing. Continue to track and trace, but let people decide if they sit in a pub with a couple of friends or decide to visit their parents inside.
It's got to be down to personal choice now.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by AnaMaria October 06, 2020 at 21:29
We have to share the burden of restrictions fairly across society. Otherwise we are telling our grandparents and vulnerable friends that our needs and wants trump their quality of life. Our grandparents fought for our futures and our parents were evacuated during the war to give us the life we have. Our vulnerable friends and family already carry a burden. It is our turn to take the burden. As a society we cannot keep ‘bailing out’ businesses because we want more freedoms than make sense during a pandemic.
For me this means everyone following the health advice to the letter and driving the levels of infection back down. We all have to share the responsibility of additional impact on the economy if we are not willing to play our individual part in the solution. I felt we were very close to phase four, and in particular giving more access to family with people in Care Homes, however, that all disappeared with the significant outbreaks. We can do this!
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by alanmacrae41 October 06, 2020 at 21:44
If you have social distancing measures in place then the industry does not make any money.
If you restrict opening times the industry will no longer make any money.
If you have no music it ruins the atmosphere and makes venues miserable and undesirable and people stop going. Slowly but they really will stop going. Going out is becoming a depressing business.
If this goes on much longer people will get out of the habit of going out and will not restart.
At the moment a lot of the industry is hanging on by their fingertips but soon it will go off the cliff and the result will be catastrophic! For hundreds of thousands of Scots. Listen to those in the industry we know precisely what will happen. When it comes to public health you say you listen to the experts, do the same concerning the hospitality industry. Please.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by PoppyG October 06, 2020 at 22:25
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by PoppyG October 06, 2020 at 22:32
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by slimbofat October 07, 2020 at 11:53
We currently have a situation where the lockdown restrictions are not fairly applied. Sectors of the economy are closed for no apparent reason and socialising is only allowed near a card reader. The restrictions should be fairer on younger generations who are being hit as hard by the lockdowns as older generations are hit by Covid.
With proper testing information (showing where outbreaks are mostly likely to occur, where rates are highest etc.) citizens can make more informed decisions on their everyday activities. Each person has a unique risk profile/tolerance and until we have clear information and data available, risk assessment will be made based on the profile of the lowest risk tolerance (i.e. walking at the pace of the slowest).
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ek1 October 07, 2020 at 12:31
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Robert866 October 07, 2020 at 17:26
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by sarahwatt October 07, 2020 at 23:46
More resources should be put into finding innovative ways to offer protection to the most vulnerable until there are vaccines or treatments to prevent death; ways that don’t cause all the collateral harm we're seeing from heavy suppression strategies.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Daradara October 08, 2020 at 20:59
When you imposed lockdown in March, I thought that, being as it was such an exceptional measure, it would be lifted as soon as evidence appeared that it was necessary (hint: that evidence _did_ appear as early as late March). Instead, you drifted into a mindset where lockdown was the default position and getting us out of lockdown required piles and piles of evidence. This is an approach that is completely at odds with democracy, with how Scotland has come to be what it is now and with human nature, and it needs to go as a matter of urgency.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Clark88 October 09, 2020 at 14:23
“When we locked ourselves down we also locked down the virus with us. Therefore when we emerge from lockdown we release the virus”, or words to those effect. This in itself says, no matter when or how you reimpose lockdown measures, you are delaying the inevitable. It stands to reason therefore that everyone will, at some point, test positive and/or succumb to this virus, whether they are restricted or not. I’d to like to see the humility and decency in our leaders to admit fault where it clearly lies and stop perpetuating the denial.
Top priorities right now should include serious discussion about false positive rating that the test is known to yield. The polymerase chain reaction test is the sole factor in every decision we are seeing and yet, it is on this weak scientific basis that I have had the rug ripped from under me in terms of work, along with many, many others.
It is on this weak scientific basis that a generation has seen their promising formative years met instead with uncertainty and mental health battles, which were already at alarming levels prior to the pandemic.
It is on this weak scientific basis that people have experienced the inconceivable agony and torture which persuades them that taking their own lives is a better way out. Think about that.
It is on this scientific basis that we have turned people against each other and categorised people seeking honest debate conspiracy theorists.
It is on this weak scientific basis that cancer patients, let alone patients of other serious illnesses, are being neglected or perpetually kept waiting in the name of saving lives. We are told those with co-morbidities are at a much higher risk - this is surely giving greater likelihood to this actually happening.
It is on this weak scientific basis that people have been prohibited from visiting their dying relatives, never again able to tell them what they so yearned to say.
The list goes on and on.
Let’s not keep adding to it.
Address the serious issues and questions surrounding the test itself. Who is infectious, who isn’t, who has dead virus as opposed to live, what cycle threshold is too sensitive, what cycle threshold is realistic, etc. Then and only then can we respond proportionately.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Pipkins October 10, 2020 at 10:06
We've tried 'opening up' the economy over the last few months and this has effectively thrown out a lot of the progress gained through the sacrifices made by the people in Scotland who followed lock down restrictions to the letter. The Scottish government have had excellent advice from Scientific advisers and need to follow that advice while understanding that we still know relatively little about this virus and therefore need to apply the precautionary principle while we learn more. We know that the virus is mainly spread through particles in the air and we have been getting more and more evidence that masks can protect both the people around us and the wearer. Yet we are so slow and so suspicious when it comes to putting measures in place that are commonplace in other parts of the world.
It's understandable that people are losing patience with restrictions and want life to return to some kind of normality but the reality is that we have to deal with the situation we find ourselves in now which means living very restricted lives so as to protect people's lives and health. People whose jobs and liveliehoods have been severly affected by the restrictions need to be supported fully and this will have to involve putting maximum pressure on the UK government. The mental health of the nation also needs to be taken into account. But the bottom line is, we all need to be patient, we need to listen to the science, we need to take precautions seriosuly and we need to find new ways of working and living which will allow us protect lives above all else. If we had put safety measures in place more quickly and imposed stronger restrictions for longer, we would have been able to be living more normal lives by now and the economy would be in a better position.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by APragmatist October 10, 2020 at 16:11
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Penfold October 11, 2020 at 03:29
There you go, that was an easy submission.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by GC9090 October 11, 2020 at 13:12
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Cevs1289 October 11, 2020 at 14:22
As a teacher I can’t work if my own children aren’t in school. I can’t help them (as primary children) engage with online learning while also teaching my own class. It’s the worst of all worlds.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by PatC October 11, 2020 at 14:40
We do need to accept that doing everything that we can to eliminate the virus is the correct way to go.
We don't have any idea how many people have been affected because there was no testing in the early days and then we had a period where people were to self-isolate but not get tested. For those who recovered completely, we will never know.
However, many of us have Long Covid which is very debilitating. I am getting great support from my GP but not all are so fortunate.
Many "long haulers" are previously fit younger people. Some were marathon runners. Many struggle to walk a few hundred yards.
The range of symptoms suffered is immense and varies from person to person.
This represents a huge hit to the working age population which will impact greatly on the economy.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Fionacinnolly October 11, 2020 at 14:50
Environmental Health to publish all hospitality Covid incidents ( as in this restaurant has had 0 positive cases in 21 days.) which would give them a traffic light system.
Keep hospitality open with normal opening hours and ‘ration’ number of visits/ drinks allowed in a set period of time. So for example by use of NI no.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Lunardirp October 11, 2020 at 16:11
Have people drive around and find the contacts if they do not respond to telephone or email. The cost to the economy and everyone if we don't do this will completely outweigh the cost of recruiting these people.
Employ more people who are not "Clinicians" in the Test and Trace to ensure the tracing is done quickly and then pass the "Call/Case" to a "Clinician" to advise.
2. Check on those who are supposed to be self-isolating. They can not be allowed to leave their house/home. This is the crucial piece as it is obvious that people are not doing this. IF everyone with a positive test or their contacts self isolates the numbers do not continue to rise at the rate they are doing.
I know this is a tricky area to get the balance right in terms of medical confidentiality, but the idea that we should just "Hope" that people are doing the right thing appears to be naive.
If that works why do we have laws and rules at all. People should just do the right thing?
The most important element of attempting to control the spread has to be people with a positive test and their contacts must self isolate.
As Margaret Ferrier has unfortunately demonstrated and surveys have suggested, this is not happening. Closing restaurants and pubs or anything else doesn't work without this.
3. Set up an anonymous helpline to allow people to report anyone they know has either symptoms or a positive test or is a close contact. Investigate as many as possible offer the alternative of getting tested or self-isolating.
4. Provide support for people to do the right thing and self-isolate. (I believe this is what the £500 payment is to do?) expand on this if necessary. (It will be a fraction of the cost to the country if we do not get this under control.)
5. Raise the fines for people who have been told to self-isolate who leave their homes. This is an unwelcome step, but it is necessary. If we are willing to accept the need to restrict peoples freedom of movement generally, then not concentrating on the most crucial element is ridiculous.
If test and trace work properly and people with a positive test, symptoms or a close contact self-isolate, the spread slows (Either this or there is something about this virus we have completely missed.)
Then the whole target outbreaks strategy works and we can reopen everything bar large gatherings (Still socially distancing, masks, hygiene, test and self-isolate.)
The problem is people are not Self-Isolating and by that I mean never leaving the house for anything other than by ambulance to hospital.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Whittijo October 11, 2020 at 17:02
What can we do safely?
Can outdoor facilities be provided that will help us now, but which will last and be available for years to come? They need to be Scottish winter proof though - a big ask.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by StevieTH0703 October 11, 2020 at 17:03
Wear masks in public areas, continue the controls for entering and using businesses like shops & restaurants, allow sports to take place and protect the vulnerable through shielding or providing services that limit their exposure and let others people live their lives.
The risk to population does not warrant such strict, intrusive controls, that are creating other long term negative impacts on society.
The government is close to losing public support as it is and no one will follow any of the rules at this rate.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mercs2011 October 11, 2020 at 17:09
I would like to have a declared "friends and family bubble" of 5/6 people who we can see indoors in our own homes, for an extended period of time. I'd like to see something similar for children now that the colder weather is starting, so that their friends can have the option of visiting inside. If we want to change the group we could have access to a COVID test, then have a period of shielding before changing bubbles. Anyone outwith this bubble we could meet outdoors, masked up, or in hospitality with strictly enforced hygene measures in place.
The idea of booking a set period of time in a bar or restaurant rather than having a curfew is a good one with restrictions on numbers in each establishment and perhaps using technology such as an app which has a maximum amount of bookings that you can make so that leaving times are staggered to minimise crowds leaving together. You can then provide contact tracing details before you go and show ID when you get there (like you would if you had booked seats on an aeroplane).
You could have set consequences for anyone wilfully breaking the health and safety rules, either as households or businesses, not just fines but community work linked to the efforts to control or help those badly impacted by the COVID pandemic
Public awareness: I'd also like to see more steps to be taken to reiterate to people why we need to work together and help each other in our communities, such as anecdotal stories from anyone suffering from long or short term COVID to show people again how easily it's spread, the real impact of the illness on the vulnerable, positive messages around protecting our loved ones and ways to show that this is not "just the flu." There could be lotos of positive stories using real people who have found ordinary ways, or used innovative ideas, to prevent the spread of the virus too.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JustAmy October 11, 2020 at 18:38
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Norrie October 11, 2020 at 19:09
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Sal1 October 11, 2020 at 19:49
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Mtracey October 11, 2020 at 20:11
My suggestion is to limit travel, everyone should stay within there own council or health board area with obvious exceptions. Stop tourists from overseas or other nations within the UK traveling here and spreading the virus. As the FM said, this virus won’t last forever but as long as people can freely travel to Scotland we will not be in a position to collectively suppress the virus. The economy will survive, issue bonds similar to war bonds and allow those who can afford to support the county do so and reap the rewards at a point in the future. Keep schools open for the benefit of our children and young people but put further and higher education to online learning to safeguard the health of all at these institutions and their families. Personally, my son goes to college one day a week and it feels like they last 7 months of staying at home has been wasted as we now need to accept this risk every week. Working from home should be the normal and while this isn’t always easy it can be done.
Please keep the daily updates from the FM, they are invaluable for information regardless of the press asking sometimes stupid questions . I feel frustrated often listening to them and I can only imagine how the FM feels .
Why the contribution is important
My idea is important as lives matter and this should be priority over having holidays and socialising freely. I have no idea if I have an underlying health condition and I am not prepared to take the chance.
by Mtracey on October 11, 2020 at 06:02PM
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by SAH123 October 11, 2020 at 20:31
We will comply - until 25th. We have cancelled so much this year trying to abide by the spirit not just the letter of the rules - but I hope that the travel guideline is removed so the personal toll is lessened. I have compelling reasons to leave the area but feel I should choose not to - and I have had many sleepless nights wresting with my conscience.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Carronhall October 11, 2020 at 20:35
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JennyNeil October 11, 2020 at 21:07
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)