Allow lockdown to ease due to scientific evidence
If you look at the figures and the facts lockdown should be eased!
If you compare the volume of deaths for the same period of time last year (ie normal level of deaths in Scotland) versus this year, the actual figure for the number of deaths from Corona Virus is minimal compared to other areas of he UK.
It has been stated that 60% of those deaths have occurred in care homes
It has also been stated that vast majority of those not in care homes are people with underlying health conditions.
Therefor recommend that care homes stay in lockdown along with all people with underlying health problems and let everyone else get back to work and on with their lives in order to save the economy.
Also no consideration that by keeping people in lock down for longer you are risking a higher suicide rate/ higher domestic abuse and higher risk for vulnerable children. There is no evidence in Scotland to agree that lockdown should be continued. Keep lockdown for those at risk only ie care homes and underlying health conditions and let every one else return to work including opening up schools.
No trust is being put into people that they will return to their businesses in a sensible manner and respect social distances, least that way their businesses can continue providing them with an income and saving the economy.
Also nobody seems to be questioning why the Government in Scotland have not ramped up the testing to the same people and same levels as England, if the testing was ramped up this would also help to determine any cases and stop the spread.
The Scottish Government is not helping everyone who is in Lockdown which is coming into its eighth week, that is 8 weeks without income for some and no light of that situation changing. Why are Limited companies being excluded from the help. For Limited companies Dividends are not being viewed as income however for self employed people dividends are being viewed as income - make up your mind and apply the rules fairly.
Some of the awful ideas that Nicola Sturgeon has so far stated ie garden centres cant open, why cant garden centres do online orders, then over the phone payment and socially distances deliveries ....by the time lockdown is over these businesses will have lost £1000 is stock. As for her also not opening rubbish dumps this again makes no sense, fly tipping has increased dramatically, allow one person into dump at a time and allow them to dispose of rubbish in a sensible manner.
So many questions need to be asked about how this whole situation has been handled and I hope those who have made these life changing decision will be held accountable when it is proven that the wrong decisions have been made.
If you compare the volume of deaths for the same period of time last year (ie normal level of deaths in Scotland) versus this year, the actual figure for the number of deaths from Corona Virus is minimal compared to other areas of he UK.
It has been stated that 60% of those deaths have occurred in care homes
It has also been stated that vast majority of those not in care homes are people with underlying health conditions.
Therefor recommend that care homes stay in lockdown along with all people with underlying health problems and let everyone else get back to work and on with their lives in order to save the economy.
Also no consideration that by keeping people in lock down for longer you are risking a higher suicide rate/ higher domestic abuse and higher risk for vulnerable children. There is no evidence in Scotland to agree that lockdown should be continued. Keep lockdown for those at risk only ie care homes and underlying health conditions and let every one else return to work including opening up schools.
No trust is being put into people that they will return to their businesses in a sensible manner and respect social distances, least that way their businesses can continue providing them with an income and saving the economy.
Also nobody seems to be questioning why the Government in Scotland have not ramped up the testing to the same people and same levels as England, if the testing was ramped up this would also help to determine any cases and stop the spread.
The Scottish Government is not helping everyone who is in Lockdown which is coming into its eighth week, that is 8 weeks without income for some and no light of that situation changing. Why are Limited companies being excluded from the help. For Limited companies Dividends are not being viewed as income however for self employed people dividends are being viewed as income - make up your mind and apply the rules fairly.
Some of the awful ideas that Nicola Sturgeon has so far stated ie garden centres cant open, why cant garden centres do online orders, then over the phone payment and socially distances deliveries ....by the time lockdown is over these businesses will have lost £1000 is stock. As for her also not opening rubbish dumps this again makes no sense, fly tipping has increased dramatically, allow one person into dump at a time and allow them to dispose of rubbish in a sensible manner.
So many questions need to be asked about how this whole situation has been handled and I hope those who have made these life changing decision will be held accountable when it is proven that the wrong decisions have been made.
Why the contribution is important
Because it is based on facts - the facts that have been presented to us by the Government - it is clear to see when the stats are looked at in the correct manner that further lockdown does not make sense based on the figures presented.
by Macleod2801 on May 10, 2020 at 04:27PM
Posted by MikeJohnston May 10, 2020 at 16:37
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Posted by JLMBD May 10, 2020 at 16:45
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by lindyloo May 10, 2020 at 16:48
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by MARshd May 10, 2020 at 16:59
Adopting this alternate strategy would tend to concentrate the scarce resources in the most needed areas, protect those most at risk and allow many others to get back to working in some form of a "new normal" and get the country back on its feet again.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by emwpaisley May 10, 2020 at 17:59
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Spice2010 May 10, 2020 at 18:13
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Nm May 10, 2020 at 20:06
1) tendency to rank measures and only choose the one with the most effect so that, for example, benefits from air travel quarrantine or wearing masks were missed.
(2) misunderstanding of what the public would tolerate. Many people went into lockdown before official advice and observe a more rigorous lockdown than their neighbours. An opportunity for a harder but ultimately shorter lockdown was missed. Here, the duration of trips outside the home and what was essential work could have been more restrictive. Household mixing and meetings outside of home could have been policed more as well as workplaces strictly sending employees home when they have symptoms.
So now the fairly weak lockdown as is needs to continue perhaps 3 weeks longer. Benefits would be to give hospitals a chance to disinfect properly and return to capacity for normal work thus stopping deaths from missed interventions. Future deaths because of economic side effects may be avoided completely if the economy can upturn sharply. This is more likely if a second peak with a second lockdown is avoided. Easier to avoid a second peak if R is 0.7 or lower.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)