Allow participation in some outdoor, mostly solitary sports.
Allow some mostly solitary, outdoor sports to go ahead. Sports where social distancing is easily achieved. For example, golf, fishing, sailing, kayaking, hill walking. If social distancing is not possible, then participantion could be limited to the family ‘bubble’. This would do wonders for people’s mental health!
Why the contribution is important
1. Good for mental health
2. Good for physical health
3. Gets people out into the fresh air
4. Allows a bit more freedom in a way that, if done carefully, should not increase the risk of virus transmission.
2. Good for physical health
3. Gets people out into the fresh air
4. Allows a bit more freedom in a way that, if done carefully, should not increase the risk of virus transmission.
by Duvessa103 on May 05, 2020 at 04:36PM
Posted by Tonyretals May 05, 2020 at 16:41
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by scottmcmartin May 05, 2020 at 16:44
Allow a saw an initial 5km as the crow flies, distance on home to course. Members only, with increased tee-times. No opening of Clubhouse/Locker rooms. All of these measures were put in place by golf clubs pre lock-down. Increase the travel distance in phases. This is what Ireland is doing.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ljk84 May 05, 2020 at 16:46
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JaneL May 05, 2020 at 16:46
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by lindyloo May 05, 2020 at 16:49
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by rst May 05, 2020 at 16:52
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by spittalhill May 05, 2020 at 16:54
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Hannahmabob May 05, 2020 at 16:57
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by fionajohn May 05, 2020 at 16:57
i can go 2 miles from my home passing 3 housrs and spend an afternoon fishing seeing and being in contact with no-one this also can apply to single person boats.i live in shetland and this can apply to a lot of people
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Phoebe20 May 05, 2020 at 16:57
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Dereklangfield May 05, 2020 at 16:58
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by scotdavid63 May 05, 2020 at 17:00
In essence, trying a one size fits all is tricky. However, need to get some business up and running in the Highlands so maybe only let people go up who have (and can prove) hotel bookings, no camper vans (maybe until later in the summer).
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by craigd May 05, 2020 at 17:06
Golf & fishing I would suggest are two activities that can with precautions be carried out without breaking Social Distancing guidelines
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Rosie May 05, 2020 at 17:07
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by OwenVickers May 05, 2020 at 17:14
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ASR May 05, 2020 at 17:18
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JoannaMac May 05, 2020 at 17:22
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Selkie May 05, 2020 at 17:24
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ICH May 05, 2020 at 17:25
without access to facilities would be very low risk if some very basic common sense protocols were put in place. Such as around keeping a safe distance and eliminating contact points.
Certainly much lower risk than buying a pint of milk......
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Hudsone728 May 05, 2020 at 17:26
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Balford May 05, 2020 at 17:27
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Atg01 May 05, 2020 at 17:28
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by MadeinGlasgow May 05, 2020 at 17:37
Any outdoor activity that does not require physical contact and can be enjoyed by a maximum of two participants who can easily maintain 2m distance, surely has to be considered as minimal risk.
As a member of a golf club I feel the benefits of allowing clubs to reopen courses, and only the course, as per R&A & Scottish Golf Union restrictions would be hugely beneficial, not only to golfers but golf clubs in general and Scotland as a country.
Membership numbers are in decline, existing members already questioning the wisdom of renewing membership for an activity they are currently unable to participate in.
The daily destruction of many years of hard work in maintaining a golf course, that has come about by virtue of the fact that the fairways are devoid of golfers, and are now in daily use by, cyclists, skateboarders, picnicking families on greens that have taken years to cultivate.
If courses are ruined, membership falls, if membership falls, courses close.
A future Scotland without golf! The vast majority of golf tourists come to play the many wonderful courses in Scotland, not only the elite courses on the Pro circuit.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by AnthonyButterworth May 05, 2020 at 17:38
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Absport May 05, 2020 at 17:50
The only problem is the view we shouldn’t travel so a maximum distance could be imposed so small remote communities are not affected
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Louisasneezer May 05, 2020 at 17:56
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Fifer72 May 05, 2020 at 18:20
We're getting restless, you can either manage our transition back to normality or we'll do it for you.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Nairnbeach May 05, 2020 at 19:28
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by sbecker May 05, 2020 at 19:32
To decide how and when to remove a given restriction you need to look at why that particular restriction was enforced to begin with. I think it's important here to distinguish between restrictions which were put in place because they directly impact the transmission of the virus, like social distancing and other restrictions that were aimed at reducing any additional demand for the NHS.
To me continued social distancing seems completely justified given the rate of infection in the population is still high and the current lack of treatment or a vaccine.
But other measures like restrictions on travel and guidance against outdoor activity were deemed necessary based on the fear that the NHS would be imminently and catastrophically overrun by Covid-19 patients. So now that we are past the peak and hospitals have fortunately not been catastrophically overrun as initially feared, restrictions on travel and outdoor access enacted in response to that fear, should now be lifted.
Accessing outdoor spaces is good for mental health and makes social distancing guidance easy to follow. Continuing to unnecessarily restrict access because of a perceived threat that never materialised can no longer be justified.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by GJTorrie May 05, 2020 at 20:56
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by stu72 May 05, 2020 at 22:53
I hope the government will relax the current restrictions around outdoor activities in the next couple of weeks.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Elgintennisclub May 06, 2020 at 07:55
As with other progressive steps in managing the pandemic, rural, quieter locations should be used as trial cases. Morayshire would be an excellent test case as we currently have few cases and a low infection rate. I’m certain our local sports clubs and associations would be delighted to assist the Scottish Government with any trials or consultations.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by GeoffDuke May 06, 2020 at 13:11
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by MichaelG May 06, 2020 at 13:51
However, people should still be encouraged to stay local to their area, or popular areas will become overcrowded and effective distancing will be difficult.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by YMCA May 06, 2020 at 14:51
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by libbydale May 06, 2020 at 14:56
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by jrob May 06, 2020 at 15:13
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Stuarty May 06, 2020 at 16:21
These sports should be restarted immediately.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by lizcarey78 May 06, 2020 at 18:41
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by jrob May 06, 2020 at 20:55
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by paulineT May 06, 2020 at 22:52
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by SJM May 06, 2020 at 23:33
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Colin87 May 07, 2020 at 05:48
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by CharlottePlayfair May 07, 2020 at 06:11
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kookaburra71 May 07, 2020 at 07:00
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by aloneinthehills May 07, 2020 at 09:25
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Ossian May 07, 2020 at 10:42
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by SadieMich May 07, 2020 at 11:42
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by JohnA May 07, 2020 at 13:19
I think the wellbeing benefits would be great and the transmission downsides small.
There is a concern of Mountain Rescue and similar services being under more pressure if this is allowed. You could add some rules that would mitigate this, for example (as with everything in this lockdown, these are mostly self-policed anyway):
- Some guidance that only those with experience should be going outside.
- Not allowing it on days with a poor weather forecast.
- Having a time limit on how long you can go outdoors for.
- Requiring all outdoor activities (hikes etc.) to start before a certain time of day.
- Limiting access to beauty spots and heavily trafficked trails perhaps by using permits available on a website.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by aloneinthehills May 07, 2020 at 14:06
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by SandyJ May 07, 2020 at 18:59
Government advice should remind participants of safety, but participants should be responsible for their own safety as they always have been. Restrictions because of weather forecasts, time of day, time limits shouldn't apply, nor should limited access. It should be about giving people more space!
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by DRW May 08, 2020 at 09:15
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Bigshiny May 08, 2020 at 09:21
This trust should be extended, in these times, to include social distancing measures to be practised by those who wish to return to the mountains and rivers of our country.
This will encourage exercise for the masses who have been stuck inside, increase appreciation for our natural areas, and potentially bring revenue back to rural communities who rely on tourism - who have struggled due to the absolute shut down of people travelling north during this important season.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Johnh May 08, 2020 at 09:42
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by markcou May 08, 2020 at 09:43
Non teams would be limited to maybe max of 4 people 2M apart and would not have to use public transport to get there.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by blunderman May 08, 2020 at 09:44
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by paulagnew May 08, 2020 at 10:09
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by dblair May 08, 2020 at 10:57
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by TempusFugit May 08, 2020 at 11:32
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by experienceecosse May 08, 2020 at 12:10
Local parks and walks are now so overcrowded and if we are told that exercise can take place twice a day, I fear that physical distancing will become even more difficult than it already is without driving to a more distant but still local outdoor space.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Wallace May 08, 2020 at 13:34
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by MarcoC May 08, 2020 at 15:48
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by kedra May 08, 2020 at 16:34
Traveling to another area is no more risky given the virus is already being taken seriously in all parts of the country.
Hillwalking, paragliding, mountain biking, angling, climbing outdoors, shooting, driving for pleasure, visiting beauty spots, motorcycling to the beach. None of these incur an increased risk of viral spread and it's sad to see people fined for this like motorcyclists in England were. It undermines the credibility of lockdown if governments make scientifically unjustifiable decisions to restrict personal freedoms with concerns about a small increase in A&E admissions from car crashes or mountain rescue call outs etc.
It's fantastic to see people out on their bikes and running. This is an opportunity for people to create healthy leisure habits. We have some of the worst alcoholism, drug use and obesity in Scotland and this could hit the NHS hard once Covid fizzles out and cost us all. The current collective house arrest perpetuates unhealthy habits.
It's easy for me in Inverness to relax in garden or buzz around on my bike enjoying lockdown. I feel really sorry for those in our larger cities who have been criticised for visiting the local park by car when they may have been safely distancing themselves and avoiding public transport for good reason. These are also the people in densely populated areas that you don't want to breach the lockdown so please make it easier on them by giving them some freedom back.
Simply, if people touch something they gel their hands, they keep 2m apart to avoid proximity.
who cares if they have a picnic in the park, go for 2 or 3 runs or walks a day, wander up a munro, go kayaking off the west coast etc etc.
We don't have to sacrifice quality of life to restrict viral spread. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by kedra May 08, 2020 at 16:44
Individuals are already flouting lockdown rules to have dinner parties, video gaming sessions, visit lovers, open their pubs secretly for regulars etc. If people decide to break the rules then they are doing so of their own volition because they don't respect them. Maybe they consider them disproportionate?
It's just as easy currently to invite a few friends over and sneak them in the back door or meet them in the local park as it is to organise a hillwalking meet up so I don't think that's a fair argument against allowing more personal freedom.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Chimp May 08, 2020 at 17:13
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Simon756 May 08, 2020 at 21:02
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Njessop May 08, 2020 at 21:19
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Rachel_T1502 May 08, 2020 at 22:35
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Corab May 09, 2020 at 10:33
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by FedPezz May 09, 2020 at 13:02
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Pegger May 09, 2020 at 13:36
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Forreslass May 09, 2020 at 15:33
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Edwold May 09, 2020 at 22:39
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Kinley May 10, 2020 at 10:05
I'm quite sure that the risk assessment for a great many solitary outdoor pursuits will indicate that they are very low risk in terms of viral transmission and I would strongly urge the Government to relax restrictions in this regard.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Scott_Doig May 10, 2020 at 14:08
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by kpm321 May 10, 2020 at 17:14
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Invicta May 10, 2020 at 20:17
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Stargazer1960 May 11, 2020 at 15:06
Risk increases if equipment is shared or borrowed. Also if involving travel then isolation from local communities will need to be respected.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by GMPotts May 11, 2020 at 16:14
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by paulc May 11, 2020 at 19:15
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Hamsterpus May 11, 2020 at 19:42
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Louise88 May 11, 2020 at 20:24
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by IMcK May 11, 2020 at 20:39
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)