Centralised quarantine
All people who 1) test positive for coronavirus, 2) have coronavirus symptoms, 3) are close contacts of either of the above, and 4) as the virus dies down domestically, those entering from abroad, should be required to quarantine in *central locations* for at least 14 days. Currently, there are a lot of empty hotels that could be funded by the government this way, or by taking over empty gyms and other empty large public institutions and turned into field hospitals. Food and other amenities should be provided by the government to these people. This is an alternative to the current policy that just recommends "self-isolation" at home.
Why the contribution is important
This is a policy that has proven successful across many non-European countries, such as Taiwan, China, South Korea and Vietnam, in one form or another. They have virtually eliminated the virus domestically.
1) Eliminates home infection, unlike self-isolation, particularly amongst those families who live in cramped accommodation, cutting down on spread
2) Encourages more people to isolate when they have the disease, instead not complying because they might infect their families
3) Centralised location means you can bring in medical staff to monitor these people over time, and catch them quickly before their oxygen levels deteriorate, meaning they can be treated more successfully in the hospital later on if needed.
4) Those medical staff will need less training than trying to expand ICU capacity, as was done with the Nightingale hospitals, meaning this capacity can be expanded faster
5) Stamping out the virus this way means that you can more quickly remove the lockdown, meaning the economy can recover to a better state a bit faster and more people can see their loved ones.
Here is a paper explaining the Chinese experience and why it worked in more detail:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30744-3/fulltext
1) Eliminates home infection, unlike self-isolation, particularly amongst those families who live in cramped accommodation, cutting down on spread
2) Encourages more people to isolate when they have the disease, instead not complying because they might infect their families
3) Centralised location means you can bring in medical staff to monitor these people over time, and catch them quickly before their oxygen levels deteriorate, meaning they can be treated more successfully in the hospital later on if needed.
4) Those medical staff will need less training than trying to expand ICU capacity, as was done with the Nightingale hospitals, meaning this capacity can be expanded faster
5) Stamping out the virus this way means that you can more quickly remove the lockdown, meaning the economy can recover to a better state a bit faster and more people can see their loved ones.
Here is a paper explaining the Chinese experience and why it worked in more detail:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30744-3/fulltext
by ajd253 on May 05, 2020 at 06:05PM
Posted by JohnT May 05, 2020 at 18:17
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by CocoTC12 May 05, 2020 at 18:20
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Colette May 05, 2020 at 18:40
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ajd253 May 05, 2020 at 23:13
That said, even if the government offered *voluntary* centralised quarantine, this would still be better than the status quo, where people who want to quarantine away from their families, aren't allowed to do so and given little support.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ajd253 May 05, 2020 at 23:16
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)