Ensure accurate and up to date evidence is relayed to the public
I think the government and FM really should make an effort to be very transparent and relay to the public what specific studies and “evidence” they refer to at certain points of argumentation.
Just as an example when arguing for/against any restrictions impacting or justified by the safety of children, children transmission rates and school closures/reopening the government could easily link or point to regularly updated reviews by the DFTB-team (don’t forget the bubbles). Hereby, in this example, the public could be informed that children are mostly unaffected, transmission from children to others is less likely and similar findings supported by the available evidence.
Why the contribution is important
Such an approach would let the public understand the rationale behind decisions and restrictions. The public would also be shown very clearly which restrictions and actions are not based on solid evidence but instead mainly driven by fears and/or politics since high quality evidence would in those situations be lacking.
by Gustavlinder on May 07, 2020 at 04:23PM
Posted by Benthelobey May 07, 2020 at 16:43
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)