Testing the population
This idea was locked by a moderator
It is no longer possible to add comments or ratings to this idea.
Moderation reason: Thank you for your idea. As it is similar to an existing idea, please contribute to that instead by using the search function on the main page of this site. You can find ideas by searching for keywords or selecting a topic from the list. Your idea will still be taken into account in analysis.
Why are we not testing everyone ? I am aware that you can get false positives and false negatives but if it is good enough for all suspected Cases that are admitted to hospitals why not test everyone . As we know a lot of the population are not showing any signs or unaware through the mildest symptoms that they actually have it .This then makes these people carriers with potential to pass it on .
To relax lockdown we need to make a concerted effort to test everyone thus reducing the percentage of people passing it on
Drive through testing areas are vastly under used
Yes it may mean a delay in the results due to increased demand but as I see it this would be best way forward to reduce second spike .
To relax lockdown we need to make a concerted effort to test everyone thus reducing the percentage of people passing it on
Drive through testing areas are vastly under used
Yes it may mean a delay in the results due to increased demand but as I see it this would be best way forward to reduce second spike .
Why the contribution is important
To reduce potential spread and second spike in no positive cases and deaths
by Johnston on May 07, 2020 at 07:22AM
Comments
Log in or register to add comments and rate ideas