Scottish Borders should be a National Park
The Scottish Borders lies between the West Coast Main Line and the East Coast Main Line south of Edinburgh and the new Borders Railway penetrates the heart of this area and could be extended to Carlisle. It is hilly and largely rural, with the River Tweed flowing west to east through it. The highest hill in the region is Broad Law in the Manor Hills. In the east of the region, the area that borders the River Tweed is flat and is known as 'The Merse'. The main towns and villages of Galashiels, Selkirk, Hawick, Jedburgh, Earlston, Kelso, Newtown St Boswells, St Boswells, Peebles, Melrose and Tweedbank are located here too.
Why the contribution is important
This would enhance the tourism potential of this area and encourage use of the Borders Railway to Tweedbank and its potential extension south to Carlisle. The area was made famous by the Waverley novels of Sir Walter Scott and has much fine scenery as well as many cultural attractions including Abbotsford House, Bowhill House, Floors Castle, Mellerstain House, Melrose Abbey, Thirlestane Castle, Traquair House, etc. Many traditional industries could be revived such as tweed in Hawick or salmon fishing on the River Tweed and Teviot, and area is also home to many golf courses and outdoor sport activities. The region is defined as much by the landscape as it is by its spellbinding abbeys, awe-inspiring stately homes and castles, and the time-honoured and truly unique Common Ridings. It's really no surprise that these lands inspired the works of literary greats like Sir Walter Scott and John Buchan.
Many of the towns in the area could be "gateway hubs" for sustainable access to the National Park by public transport, walking and cycling. There is potential for steam train excursions running from Edinburgh along the Borders line to Carlisle and returning via WCML similar to the regular steam excursions on the Settle & Carlisle Line in England from various origin points. Alternatively could also return from Carlisle via Hexham and Newcastle and the ECML. So could be a good way to build sustainable tourism in the Scottish Borders. Also could attract visitors from Northern England too. So has a good population catchment on its doorstep that it can serve as a "green lung" and national park.
Many of the towns in the area could be "gateway hubs" for sustainable access to the National Park by public transport, walking and cycling. There is potential for steam train excursions running from Edinburgh along the Borders line to Carlisle and returning via WCML similar to the regular steam excursions on the Settle & Carlisle Line in England from various origin points. Alternatively could also return from Carlisle via Hexham and Newcastle and the ECML. So could be a good way to build sustainable tourism in the Scottish Borders. Also could attract visitors from Northern England too. So has a good population catchment on its doorstep that it can serve as a "green lung" and national park.
by ajnaughton on May 20, 2022 at 06:31PM
Posted by malcolmrdickson May 22, 2022 at 14:55
Much of this problem is due to the shrunken industries which once supported a thriving economy right up until the first half of the 20th century, ie woollens and textiles. One of the effects of that decline is that many working age families have had to move elsewhere for employment, resulting in a demography that is trending towards a larger proportion of older people and smaller proportion of economically active people. None of the very welcome additional funding directed at the Borders is permanent, albeit it will create hopefully permanent arms length organisations to continue to try to improve the local economies and life experience.
The three most locally valued assets of the Scottish Borders, it's landscape, built heritage and cultural heritage, have not yet been used to fulfil the potential they have to combine and create a huge attraction to UK and global tourists. This is despite the fact that the inter-relationship of these three assets in the Scottish Borders is probably second to none in the UK. Tourists who seek these aspects to be part of their experience of visiting new places know very well what National Park status signifies. NPs are areas where biodiversity and sustainable natural environment, as well as responsible land use and management, are valued and encouraged; they are areas where quality facilities for visitors and residents are provided to encourage responsible access to the countryside and built heritage; and they are areas where local people welcome the opportunities to enhance the visitor experience of a National Park.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by ricc45 May 26, 2022 at 13:11
Partly for these reasons, designation would be virtually costless and the strengthening local economy would make a significant contribution to the Scottish economy. It would be win-win for everyone.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by camusfearna May 27, 2022 at 09:45
Arguably, one of the areas that least requires to be considered for a new national park is the south of Scotland, given that it has recently (April 2020) been provided with a new dedicated enterprise organisation - South of Scotland Enterprise (SOSE) - as the economic and community development agency for D&G and Scottish Borders. It was established in recognition of the unique circumstances of the South of Scotland and the need for a fresh approach to drive inclusive growth across the area. A criteria therefore should be whether there already exists a dedicated economic and community organisation focused on the area in question. Further, the D&G and Scottish Borders already have in place a number of designated and protected areas for landscape and nature. A National Park in the south of Scotland would add an expensive and unnecessary additional layer of bureaucracy, complicate development planning arrangements and risk interfering with the delivery by SOSE for the region.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by malcolmrdickson May 30, 2022 at 12:28
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by PeterNeuberger May 30, 2022 at 19:17
My first comment is that Lorna Slater said that the commitment was for "at least" one more NP, which leaves the door open for both these proposals going forward as NP designations. Why not? It can only be good for Scotland and for the South of Scotland in particular.
But if I had to choose between the two, I have to say I am confused by the Galloway proposal. The proposed NP is in Galloway, but that is a large area. It is a very varied landscape and the GNPA report seems to lack focus on what makes any part of Galloway special enough for NP status over any other part. It lacks a narrative. It rather depends on an acceptance that there should be a NP in Galloway somewhere and then leave it up to the Scottish Government to figure out where it should be and how big - possibly by a lengthy consultation
The Scottish Borders proposal, on the other hand, seems to have a very strong narrative, with a vibrant local culture, a unique history which binds the area together and a very identifiable landscape. The CSNP have
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by geoffreykolbe May 31, 2022 at 06:20
A National Park status will do that in a way all the marketing efforts in the past have failed. Visitors who do tarry in the area are surprised by the great variety of facilities and attractions and the oft used refrain is - "I did not know it was here!"
If there was National Park status, people would know it was here and they would know what to expect when they got here. National Parks the world over are a 'kite mark' of impressive scenery, great visitor attractions and lots to do.
As for the comment that a National Park would just "add layers of bureaucracy" and "complicate planning arrangements" you have obviously not read the abundant reports on the Scottish Borders National Park website https://www.scottishbordersnationalpark.com/resources/ which show that the old preconceptions of a National Park do not have to apply. The Campaign are proposing that the NP would be wholly within the boundary of the Scottish Borders, so there is no reason why the existing Scottish Borders planning department should not carry on administering the planning as before, with the NP Authority as a statutory consultee.
As for "interfering with the delivery by SOSE for the region" that sounds very much like SOSE-knows-best and SOSE should not expect to be guided and informed by local communities and bodies that represent local communities - as a National Park would do.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by borbal May 31, 2022 at 06:47
Having diligently read through the 'resources' on the Scottish Borders National Park website, one thing that really struck me was that a National Park does not have to be a drain on the National treasure. Sure a National Park would cost money to run and administer, but much of that could be sourced by fund raising in one way or another, and the increased tax take due to the increased visitor spending in the area would, I am sure, more than offset the Scottish Government annual grant. As far as the Scottish Government is concerned, a National Park could be a profitable investment!
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by camusfearna May 31, 2022 at 11:07
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Gorr73 May 31, 2022 at 11:53
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by camusfearna June 01, 2022 at 13:28
The relationship with planning policy, including windfarms, are conveniently being ignored by those proposing to cover a very large area across the south of Scotland with a NP designation and thus, on the face of it, prohibit any onshore renewables being deployed in the area and potentially require the removal of existing onshore renewables in the area.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by geoffreykolbe June 01, 2022 at 18:46
Can that be said of SOSE? I am not nearly so sure....
Of course SOSE should and does consult with local communities and bodies which represent local communities.
To pretend that the Enterprise agencies essentially carry out the remit of a National Park is clearly not sensible.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Sarsen June 01, 2022 at 19:14
1. Conserve and enhance nature
2. Promote sustainable use of natural resources
3. Promote understanding and enjoyment
4. Promote sustainable economic and social development
We will therefore also be considering why National Park status would improve an area's future, and the level of support for the designation from people within the area.
Why the contribution is important
We need to have some criteria to use to assess areas for consideration as National Parks. We want the public to add their ideas to our existing criteria.
by ScottishGovernment on May 10, 2022 at 10:52AM
********************************************************************
Already some bits of AONB in border regions. But the area is ill-protected, despite it being obviously an extensive area of natural beauty stretching from sea to sea, and from the English border to the northern edge of the Southern Uplands.
Also community buyout <check> areas.
The Scottish Borders already has in place the four criteria the Act covers with the potential for these to grow further with promotion :
1. Conserve and enhance nature - the Borders has an attractive and varied landscape providing a wide range of ecosystems, but this could be further enriched.
2. Promote sustainable use of natural resources - the landscape, including AONBs, as a resource for walking and cycling and mountain biking, long distance footpaths, quarries, sheep rearing for the woollen industry, salmon and other river fishing.
3. Promote understanding and enjoyment - tourism is already significant, but in an area as relatively empty as the Scottish Borders could be increased without detrimental impact.
4. Promote sustainable economic and social development - the area has struggled from the loss of much of its woollen industry, but remains a centre of excellence for it, and in a time of growing awareness of the damage from plastics, woollens may yet make a comeback; tourism has a lot of potential to grow.
But on top of these, the Scottish Borders boasts :
- No major post-industrial eyesores
- A low population density
- Pleasant towns
- Places of myth and legend - Thomas the Rhymer, King Arthur, Merlin, Tam Lin.
- Visible history where the past has survived into the present - hill forts from the Iron Age (even three broch bases), medieval abbeys, castles and fortified farm buildings from the reiver times, mills from the woollen industry.
- Cultural traditions - the Common Ridings and town festival weeks, the ba' games, Rugby (including the Sevens tournaments), the Book Festival.
- Proximity to the Central Belt and Northern England.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Sarsen June 01, 2022 at 19:16
1. Conserve and enhance nature - the Borders has an attractive and varied landscape providing a wide range of ecosystems, but this could be further enriched.
2. Promote sustainable use of natural resources - the landscape, including AONBs, as a resource for walking and cycling and mountain biking, long distance footpaths, quarries, sheep rearing for the woollen industry, salmon and other river fishing.
3. Promote understanding and enjoyment - tourism is already significant, but in an area as relatively empty as the Scottish Borders could be increased without detrimental impact.
4. Promote sustainable economic and social development - the area has struggled from the loss of much of its woollen industry, but remains a centre of excellence for it, and in a time of growing awareness of the damage from plastics, woollens may yet make a comeback; tourism has a lot of potential to grow.
But on top of these, the Scottish Borders boasts :
- No major post-industrial eyesores
- A low population density
- Pleasant towns
- Places of myth and legend - Thomas the Rhymer, King Arthur, Merlin, Tam Lin.
- Visible history where the past has survived into the present - hill forts from the Iron Age (even three broch bases), medieval abbeys, castles and fortified farm buildings from the reiver times, mills from the woollen industry.
- Cultural traditions - the Common Ridings and town festival weeks, the ba' games, Rugby (including the Sevens tournaments), the Book Festival.
- Proximity to the Central Belt and Northern England.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by slochd June 03, 2022 at 01:00
Several European and Scandinavian already successfully operate cross border national parks and enjoy shared costs and responsibilities with clear benefits for both parties. Hunting eagles and most visiting tourists to National Parks have little concern over administrative boundaries with experience being their priority.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by carlaiolanda1234 June 04, 2022 at 23:52
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)