Prioratising community energy and shared ownership models
The limits of voluntary community benefit payments have been widely discussed, including in previous posts here, which touch on the lack of transparency, accountability and community power.
For the energy transition to be just and transformational, the current market organisation needs to be reimagined. Planning permission, grid connections, and bit competition should always prioratise projects of highest community benefits which would be community owned projects (community energy and shared ownership). If project developers do not commit to adequate community benefit schemes, they should be rejected.
Why the contribution is important
See the Manifesto recommendations from Scottish Community Coalition on Energy: https://communityenergy.scot/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/SCCE-manifesto-recommendations-FINAL.pdf
by Castanietta on March 13, 2026 at 11:29AM
Posted by Sarahm1 March 13, 2026 at 11:57
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by busteramg55 March 13, 2026 at 16:27
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by shonarosehall March 13, 2026 at 16:55
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Bonanza March 16, 2026 at 11:55
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by Flecala March 16, 2026 at 16:40
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)
Posted by LoreineatBingera March 17, 2026 at 15:45
A Scottish Government Energy Fund should support such community energy partnerships through the percentage it takes from all renewable developments and their projected energy profit.
Report this Comment (Requires Log In)